Homework 4
Solution Key (Revenue-Share HHI, CR2, CR4)
👉 Download HW 4 solution file here
Definitions
Let firm \(i\) have revenue \(R_i = p_i \cdot q_i\).
Let total market revenue be \(VM\) (column VM).
Define revenue share as:
\[
sh_i = \frac{R_i}{VM} = \frac{p_i q_i}{VM}
\]
Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI, 0–10,000 scale)
\[ HHI = \sum_{i=1}^{N} (100 \cdot sh_i)^2 \]Concentration Ratio (\(CR_k\))
\[ CR_k = \sum_{j=1}^{k} sh_{(j)} \quad \text{where } sh_{(1)} \ge sh_{(2)} \ge \cdots \]- CR2: sum of top two revenue shares
- CR4: sum of top four revenue shares
- CR2: sum of top two revenue shares
Use revenue shares for all calculations:
\[sh_i = \frac{p_i q_i}{V_M}.\]
Mapping to Excel Columns
Per month (row):
Revenues
r1 = p1*q1(Jeminy)
r2 = p2*q2(Cousins)
r3 = p3*q3
r4 = p4*q4
r5 = p5*q5
All Others:
r_others = MAX(0, VM - (r1 + r2 + r3 + r4 + r5))
Shares
sh_i = r_i / VMfor each of the 5 named firms (+ Others ifr_others > 0)
Excel tips (replace shares_range with the cell range of shares):
HHI = SUMPRODUCT((100*shares_range)^2)
CR2 = SUM(LARGE(shares_range,{1,2}))
CR4 = SUM(LARGE(shares_range,{1,2,3,4}))
Do not use
QMfor HHI/CR — we are using revenue shares, not quantity shares.
Graphs Over Time
Create a Year–Month column and compute monthly HHI, CR2, and CR4 using revenue shares.
Produce three line charts: HHI, CR2, and CR4 vs. date.
Interpretation Thresholds
DOJ/FTC HHI screens (0–10,000 scale):
- Unconcentrated: HHI < 1500
- Moderately concentrated: 1500–2500
- Highly concentrated: > 2500
CR rules of thumb:
- CR4 < 40% → fragmented / competitive
- CR4 ≈ 40–60% → loose oligopoly
- CR4 > 60% → tight oligopoly
- High CR2 (> 40–50%) → strong duopoly tendency
Use both levels and trends to describe market structure.
Answering Management’s Questions
- HHI over time: Report the level and trend. Compare to thresholds above.
- CR2/CR4 over time: Highlight concentration patterns. High/stable CRs indicate persistent market power.
- Perfect competition?
- Only plausible if HHI is low (<1500) and CR4 < 40%.
- Otherwise, the market is likely oligopolistic, not perfectly competitive.
- Only plausible if HHI is low (<1500) and CR4 < 40%.
- Cousins’ position:
Report
\[ sh_{\text{Cousins}} = \frac{p_2 q_2}{VM} \] each month, note if it is a top-2 or top-4 firm, and whether its share is increasing or decreasing over time.
Common Pitfalls
- Forgetting Others when
VM > Σ(p_i q_i)→ underestimates concentration.
- Mixing units (quantities instead of revenues).
- Shares must sum to 1 for accurate results.
- HHI/CR should always be calculated monthly, then graphed over time.